Grading
Identify quality concerns using observable signs instead of relying on memory or guesswork.
From idea to experience
Case study 03 / Performance support
A concept for helping grocery associates make faster, more consistent decisions about freshness, rotation, stocking priorities, sanitation, and product disposition during the flow of work.
PRODUCT DECISION
The Challenge
Produce associates work in a changing environment. Product condition, floor inventory, deliveries, sanitation needs, and customer requests compete for attention. The correct next step often depends on context, not a single memorized rule.
Traditional onboarding can explain standards, but it cannot anticipate every moment on the sales floor. Associates also need compact support that helps them recognize a situation, choose an action, and confirm the standard while the work is happening.
Decisions to support
Identify quality concerns using observable signs instead of relying on memory or guesswork.
Balance floor gaps, product condition, customer demand, and time-sensitive tasks.
Keep, rotate, reduce, donate, or discard based on a clear decision path.
Use concise prompts to verify sanitation, presentation, and completion before moving on.
The Design Response
Start with repeated decisions, interruptions, and moments where associates need fast guidance.
Reserve training for concepts and practice. Put frequently checked information at the point of work.
Use short prompts, visible priorities, and decision paths that can be scanned in seconds.
Measure decision consistency, time to independence, rework, and manager interventions.
Inside the toolkit
Each component answers a different question: what needs attention, what condition am I seeing, what should I do next, and how do I know the task is complete?
NOWWet wall freshness check10 min
NEXTRotate berries and grapes20 min
WATCHBanana table inventoryLow
A short triage view keeps urgent quality tasks visible without turning the shift into a long checklist.
Observable cues help associates explain a decision and apply the same standard across similar products.
The matrix makes prioritization explicit when several stocking tasks compete for attention.
OBSERVEWhat did the associate notice?
EXPLAINWhich standard guided the choice?
TRYApply it to a second example.
CONFIRMCan the associate decide independently?
A repeatable conversation helps supervisors coach judgment instead of only correcting the final action.
What this project demonstrates
Recurring decisions, workflow pressures, and moments of need are translated into a focused performance-support strategy.
Frequently checked information is placed in concise tools associates can use during the flow of a busy shift.
Observable cues, visible priorities, and clear action paths support consistent judgment instead of simple rule recall.
Scannable layouts and compact prompts make essential guidance easier to find, interpret, and apply quickly.
Repeatable coaching prompts help supervisors reveal reasoning, reinforce standards, and build independent performance.
The concept connects design decisions to measurable evidence such as consistency, independence, rework, and manager interventions.
My role and project context
This independent portfolio project draws on my experience working in a grocery produce department. It was not commissioned, reviewed, or approved by Publix, and it does not reproduce internal training or proprietary procedures.
Current status
The toolkit currently establishes the performance strategy, decision structure, visual system, and four point-of-work support tools. Together, they form a cohesive concept for helping associates recognize priorities, apply quality standards, and explain their decisions.
Because the concept has not been piloted, this case study does not claim workplace results. The next phase would establish a baseline, test the tools during real shifts, and refine them using evidence from associate decisions and manager coaching.
Continue exploring